“"Policy Dynamics and the Narrowing of Social Forestry in the KHDPK Threaten the Certainty of Rights and Socio-Ecological Protection of Communities on the Island of Java"”

AP2SI West Java Press Conference

Good afternoon.

Greetings of sustainability.

Bandung, May 22, 2026. The West Java Indonesian Social Forestry Management Association is here

such a serious concern to direction and quality of implementation

Special Management Forest Area (KHDPK) policy, especially for

social forestry on the island of Java, which is currently tend getting further away from

The initial spirit of the goal was to reform forestry governance on the island of Java.

which supports the community and is expected to be a way to expand

community rights to forest areas, accelerating Social Forestry

as a management instrument for social, economic, and ecological, resolving conflicts

tenure, and maintaining the social and ecological sustainability of forests on the island of Java.

The initial determination of the KHPDK, through the issuance of the Decree of the Minister of Environment and Forestry

Forestry Decree Number SK.287 of 2022 concerning Determination of Forest Areas with Management

Specifically for some state forests located in production forest areas and

Protected Forests in Central Java Province, East Java Province, West Java Province, and

Banten Province, which has designated KHDPK covering 1,103,941 hectares as a hope and

important position because before this policy, the production and protected forest areas

an area of 2.5 million hectares or 76 % previously under the management of the public housing complex

forestry.

In the initial phase of the policy, the public understood that the majority in the KHDPK were for

Social Forestry. Even the policy narrative at the time mentioned a figure of 922,769 hectares.

for community access through Social Forestry. Community expectations are growing,

Forest farmer groups have begun to apply for legality and management rights in the area.

KHDPK.But the situation changed.

On April 8, 2025, the government issued Decree of the Minister of Forestry Number

149 of 2025 which revokes the previous ministerial decree. There is a contradiction in

the new decision, the government also did not explain openly how large the area is

KHDPK prioritized for Social Forestry. This condition gives rise to

unclear direction and implementation of policies and loss of certainty of access

community towards forest areas.

However, subsequently, through the issuance of the Minister of Forestry Regulation Number 8 of 2026

regarding the National Forestry Plan or RKTN 2011–2030, the government

set the KHDPK directive for Social Forestry to only 583,629 hectares. This means that, when compared with the initial projection of 922,769 hectares, there is a fact that

reduction in the allocation area for Social Forestry by 339,140 hectares (36.8%). so that,

This again narrows the space for community rights to manage forest areas and

Until today, there has been no explanation from the government regarding these existing facts.

open to the public regarding the reasons for the reduction and there was no public consultation

adequate. Forest farmer groups and Social Forestry organizations also do not

meaningfully involved in this process.

In the field, the problems are becoming more apparent.

The process of facilitation, verification, validation, and transformation of Social Forestry in the region

The KHDPK has stagnated. The government always argues that this is due to the document.

is in process, the KHDPK Management Plan has not been determined and ratified by

minister as stated in Article 475 of the Minister of Environment and Forestry Regulation No. 7 of 2021.

Apart from that, on the other hand, in the process of preparing and discussing the Regional Development Plan

The management of the KHDPK is closed and non-transparent. Supporting organizations

Social Forestry and forest farmer groups are not involved and do not receive adequate access to information, even though this policy directly concerns community rights.,

socio-ecological sustainability, and the future of forest governance on Java Island. As a result,

Social Forestry implementation technical services are not running optimally and there are

contradictory regarding the implementation of Presidential Regulation Number 28 of 2023 concerning

Integrated Planning for Accelerated Social Forestry Management Implemented in 2019

2023 – 2030 regarding the acceleration of the distribution of legal access.

So AP2SI West Java assesses that from all the existing conditions, this will

increasing tenure uncertainty, weakening the position of the community in

management of forest areas, and has the potential to give rise to social and political conflicts

field management

Therefore, through this press conference, AP2SI conveyed several attitudes and

demands:

First, KHDPK must remain a priority to improve dignity, honor, and

the welfare of society as per the initial spirit of its objectives.

Second, The government must transparently open the Management Plan document

KHDPK to the public.

Third, Forest farmer groups and Social Forestry organizations must be involved in

the policy formulation process, concretely accommodating the requests of subjects and

objects that have been submitted to the Ministry of Forestry.

Fourth, Technical services for facilitation, verification and validation of applications

Social Forestry must be implemented immediately without delay.

Fifth, The government must explain openly the basis for the changes and

reduction in Social Forestry allocations in KHDPK areas.

Sixth, KHDPK management must guarantee the social-ecological protection of the community

while maintaining the sustainability of forest functions on the island of Java, and

Seventh,The state must start changing the paradigm of Social Forestry from merely

granting access to a system of recognition, protection and management of areas

community rights-based forests.

We believe that the forests on Java Island cannot be saved by just

administrative and bureaucratic approaches. Forests will be sustainable if the community

surrounding areas receive recognition, protection, certainty of rights, and management space.

fair. Thank you.

Greetings of sustainability.

Long live the people!

Skip to PDF content
Skip to PDF content